Posted on June 26, 2008 by Moin Ansari
1) The general theme of the book is apt and very important. It is a fantastic book, well written and exposes many of the things that the young generation does not know about. I am so grateful for this wonderful gift…thank you again.
2) The book brings out some great and valid points and Munshi surely has done the right research even on events in
3) The analysis is profound and fantastic. It discussed the ideas propagated by the RSS. They want to expunge Muslims just like they expunged Buddhists
4) Of course I have serious reservations about the map at the back that shows all of Kashmir and Northern Areas as part of
5) I have written several articles on the Two Nation Theory and its validity before and after 1971.
I think Munshi and I need to spend some time in developing the right story on this…
The joint and common independence struggle of Bengalis and Bengali Muslims cannot be rejected. The Bengalis were in the forefront of the Muslim movement and this has to be highlighted. The All India Muslim League was not formed by any Punjabi chauvinist or an army general…it was formed by Waqar ul Mulk and Mohsin ul Mulk great Bengali leaders who actually paved the way for others like to come in and build a movement around the poetry and vision of Ch. Rehmat Ali and Iqbal. As you know the 1940 resolution called for SEPARATE STATES per the map shown on Rupee News site…
6) If you read the Two Nation Theory (TNT) it does not simply state that there are two nations…the theory was not created by Jinnah or his fans (Mujib traveled on a bicyle several hundred kms to hear Jinnah)..inspired by the Spanish Inquisition and Torquamada, the TNT was actually created by Rai and the RSS brigands who wanted to throw the Muslims out of the Subcontinent and conduct another Spanish Inquisition in “
7) They still want the Subcontinent for the Hindus…and Munshi properly identifies this grand plan that has to be exposed…in the current language of Terror, ethnic cleansing etc.using the word “partition” informs the planet that one country was bifurcated or vivisected (per Bal Thackery, Advani and Modi). We must not use the word “partition.
8) The word “democracy” does not appear in the
India is a plutocracy and Bengal Bundhu Mujib who created BD in the name of the democratic rights of the disenfranchised and claimed that Bhutto was not giving him power…declared himself president for life and you know the rest.
9) In 14th Aughust 1975, (the date is very significant) the Bengali nationalists who did not want BD to be colony of
10) With all due respect the events of 1971 were the fault of the army–who were trying to preserve the homeland of the Muslims in the Subcontinent and on an ideological war with the Akhand Bhartis. Munshi has eloquently defined this and brilliant stays away from the mess of 1971. I believe that the language riots were a distraction…after all the language of the Muslims of Bengal was Urdu and Farsi when Clive arrived in
11) The chapter on
12) A more detailed discussion of the BLA now headquartered in Tel Aviv (mainly for Sistan Baluchistan…but also Pakistan Baluchistan
13) The issues of Gandhi and his hypocrisy seem to have been ignored
If you are going to fight an ideological battle than the cons have to be exposed with facts
14)
The book does not have a Pakistani point of view and does not look at
15) The book ignores Indira Gandhi’s comments
16) …. made to Henry Kissinger when she said that NWFP belongs to
17) The book has to mention the growing Paktunistan movement from Pakhtun Nationalists like Ibid Ullah Jan in its new manifestation (all of
18) A nuclear armed
19) ZAB for all his faults had already seen the Indian machinations and did not want
20) This is a RAW story…tell me if there is an iota of truth in this at all or if there is some new sentiment in BD…else I would not have paid much attention to it..
21) The future problems for both
22)
23) The joint Bengali and Non-Bengali struggle for independence has to put in the right perspective especially for the younger generation. Reams have been written on the Two Nation Theory (TNT). “The Sign Doctrine” which is very similar to the book, except it concerns itself with Lord Curzon’s policy of “On to the Oxus” and then “Back to the
24) The main thrust of the Indian argument is that the creation of
25) My contention is that the 1940 resolution actually called for STATES…see Chaudhry Rehmat Ali’s maps of “Dinia” and Bangistan. It was the Bengali leadership in the Muslim League that called for country. Many nations live in different countries. The Arabs live in 22 states. The Europeans live in more than two dozen states. Britishers live in
Want to be a friend. You can link up with me on Facebook using my profile name Mohammad Munshi.
Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]